Multi-Unit Systems
For capacities greater than a single scroll module (typically 15-50 HP), multi-unit systems in parallel are used. This architecture offers unique advantages over a single large compressor.
Concept
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MULTI-SCROLL SYSTEM │
│ │
│ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ │
│ │ S1 │ │ S2 │ │ S3 │ │ S4 │ │ S5 │ │
│ │7.5HP│ │7.5HP│ │7.5HP│ │7.5HP│ │7.5HP│ │
│ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ └──┬──┘ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ └────┬────┴────┬────┴────┬────┴────┬────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌───────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Common manifold │ │
│ └─────────────────────┬─────────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ Output: 37.5 HP total │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Available Configurations
By Number of Modules
| Modules | Typical Total HP | Typical CFM | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 10-30 HP | 30-100 CFM | Small industrial |
| 3 | 15-45 HP | 45-150 CFM | Medium industrial |
| 4 | 20-60 HP | 60-200 CFM | Industrial |
| 6 | 30-90 HP | 90-300 CFM | High demand |
| 8 | 40-120 HP | 120-400 CFM | Maximum capacity |
Manufacturers and Models
| Manufacturer | Series | Modules | Max HP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Copco | SF+ | 1-4 | 30 HP |
| Ingersoll Rand | Sierra | 2-8 | 60 HP |
| Kaeser | Dental/Lab | 1-4 | 20 HP |
| BOGE | EO | 1-6 | 45 HP |
| Anest Iwata | SLP | 1-4 | 30 HP |
Operating Modes
Sequential (Cascade)
Modules start one by one based on demand:
Demand: 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
─────────────────────────────────
Module 1: OFF ON ON ON ON ON
Module 2: OFF OFF ON ON ON ON
Module 3: OFF OFF OFF ON ON ON
Module 4: OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON
Module 5: OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON
Advantages:
- Simple to implement
- Low control cost
- Efficient at partial loads
Lead Rotation
The "lead" module changes periodically to equalize wear:
Week 1: S1 → S2 → S3 → S4 → S5
Week 2: S2 → S3 → S4 → S5 → S1
Week 3: S3 → S4 → S5 → S1 → S2
...
Benefit: Uniform service life across all modules.
Hour Equalization
Controller starts the module with fewest operating hours:
| Module | Hours | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| S3 | 4,521 | 1 (starts first) |
| S1 | 4,890 | 2 |
| S5 | 5,012 | 3 |
| S2 | 5,234 | 4 |
| S4 | 5,456 | 5 (starts last) |
Master Controllers
Basic Functions
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Sequencing | Start/stop order |
| Monitoring | Pressure, temperature, status |
| Alarms | Faults, maintenance |
| Rotation | Lead change |
Advanced Functions
| Function | Description |
|---|---|
| Energy optimization | Optimal point selection |
| Demand prediction | Anticipates changes |
| Remote communication | Modbus, Ethernet, IoT |
| History | Event and data logging |
| Predictive maintenance | Trends and alerts |
Multi-Unit System Advantages
Redundancy
4-module system:
Capacity
Normal: [ON] [ON] [ON] [ON] 100%
1 fails: [ON] [ON] [ON] [XX] 75%
2 fail: [ON] [ON] [XX] [XX] 50%
Never a total shutdown as long as at least one module works.
Partial Load Efficiency
| Load | 1 Large Compressor | 4 Modules |
|---|---|---|
| 100% | Optimal | Optimal |
| 75% | Modulating (less efficient) | 3 modules ON (optimal) |
| 50% | Load/unload | 2 modules ON (optimal) |
| 25% | Very inefficient | 1 module ON (optimal) |
Maintenance Without Shutdown
Rotating maintenance:
Day 1: [MAINT] [ON] [ON] [ON] Capacity: 75%
Day 2: [ON] [MAINT] [ON] [ON] Capacity: 75%
Day 3: [ON] [ON] [MAINT] [ON] Capacity: 75%
Day 4: [ON] [ON] [ON] [MAINT] Capacity: 75%
Scalability
Year 1: [S1] [S2] [ ] [ ] Demand: 50%
Year 2: [S1] [S2] [S3] [ ] Demand: 75%
Year 3: [S1] [S2] [S3] [S4] Demand: 100%
Add modules as demand grows.
Installation
Typical Configuration
Inlet (each module)
│
┌─────────┼─────────┐
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐
│Filter│ │Filter│ │Filter│
└──┬───┘ └──┬───┘ └──┬───┘
│ │ │
┌──┴───┐ ┌──┴───┐ ┌──┴───┐
│Scroll│ │Scroll│ │Scroll│
│ 1 │ │ 2 │ │ 3 │
└──┬───┘ └──┬───┘ └──┬───┘
│ │ │
└────────┼────────┘
│
┌────────┴────────┐
│ Check valves │
└────────┬────────┘
│
┌────────┴────────┐
│ Manifold │
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
To dryer
Check Valves
Critical to prevent backflow when a module is off:
| Type | Characteristic |
|---|---|
| Disc check | Economical, general use |
| Spring check | Faster closing |
| Non-slam check | Minimal pressure loss |
Space and Ventilation
| Modules | Minimum Space | Ventilation |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 × 2 m | 200 CFM |
| 4 | 4 × 3 m | 400 CFM |
| 6 | 5 × 4 m | 600 CFM |
| 8 | 6 × 5 m | 800 CFM |
Economic Comparison
Example: 40 HP Required
| Factor | 1 × 40 HP Screw | 4 × 10 HP Scroll |
|---|---|---|
| Initial cost | $25,000 | $28,000 |
| Redundancy | None | 75% |
| Efficiency 50% load | 70% | 85% |
| Noise | 72 dB | 62 dB |
| Maintenance/year | $3,000 | $2,000 |
| Flexibility | Low | High |
10-Year Total Cost
| Factor | Screw | Multi-Scroll |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment | $25,000 | $28,000 |
| Energy* | $120,000 | $105,000 |
| Maintenance | $30,000 | $20,000 |
| Downtime** | $10,000 | $2,000 |
| Total | $185,000 | $155,000 |
*Assuming typical variable operation **Estimated cost of unscheduled shutdowns